<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>Raymond P. Burkholder - Things I Do - VRF</title>
    <link>https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/</link>
    <description>In And Around Technology and The Arts</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.7.2 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:19:23 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>VRF-lite (VRF's without MPLS)</title>
    <link>https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/index.php?/archives/9-VRF-lite-VRFs-without-MPLS.html</link>
            <category>VRF</category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/index.php?/archives/9-VRF-lite-VRFs-without-MPLS.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=9</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=9</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Raymond P. Burkholder)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;VRF-lite (Virtual Routing &amp;amp; Forwarding) is a handy construct for keeping data segregated  within a network.  It can be thought of as kind of a meta-VLAN thing.

&lt;p&gt;At one customer site, who has a number of branch offices, has a Cisco Callmanager 
solution spanning those sites.  Each site has an internet connection.  Three sites are in a 
single metro area and are linked with metro-links as well as tunnels.  A fourth site is in 
another country.  The three sites are linked to the fourth site through IPSEC tunnels.  Four 
different providers are used.

&lt;p&gt;From a real usage perspective, there are six tunnels of consequence:  the three tunnels 
from the metro area to the single site, and the three return tunnels from the single site to 
the three grouped metro sites.  Each of those six tunnels can be categorized in terms of a 
voice quality metric.  

&lt;p&gt;The design puzzle was to come up with a mechanism to route data across a set of tunnels 
and route voice across a different set of tunnels, in order to make best use of 
measured delay, jitter, and loss metrics.  Using Policy Based Routing (PBR) was one solution 
but was rejected due to its scaleability problems (ie, lack thereof). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/index.php?/archives/9-VRF-lite-VRFs-without-MPLS.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;VRF-lite (VRF&#039;s without MPLS)&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/index.php?/archives/9-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
